Smurfs should be banned?

Poll: Should smurf account be banned?
1. Yes
2. No
 [NoRespec]PhilippeleBon


Editado 18 de agosto de 2017 - 17:24 por [NoRespec]PhilippeleBon
Not necessarily banned, but sanctioned.

A good thing would be:
Each time someone plays using a significantly underrated nick for bashing enjoyments, we would completely FREEZE the rating of all his smurf accounts, to the HIGHEST RATING achieved on all his nicks.

First, during one day (as a warning), then one week, then one month, then four months, etc. until he/she finally understands.

Pedagogical and simple.
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 [7th]SaitoHajime


Escrito 19 de agosto de 2017 - 01:11
Smurfing is what keeps lobby going.
Boot Smurf and you'll b booting remaining players.
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 Toobadmate


Editado 19 de agosto de 2017 - 02:54 por Toobadmate
How to determine if someone is smurfing?
I can understand you dont want to wait if you got rekt during the game (so there is nothing to do for you) until the last player who walled his last vills in is defeated. And in the npl you can lose 20 team games in a row despite being good. And when you play a 1vs1 you can easily beat someone rated much higher
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 [PanCs]dargas3120


Escrito 19 de agosto de 2017 - 10:25
i'm sick of smurfs, but not all the smurfs, those who intentionally smurf to destroy beginners/players with lower level than them and surrender once the match is over.
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 Pakva_Lozhkin


Escrito 19 de agosto de 2017 - 16:51
We should build a wall and keep smurfs away, make voobly great again folks!
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 Anik3t_


Escrito 19 de agosto de 2017 - 17:03
RTD Masters of FFA
26th August 2017

RTD 1v1 Tournament
2nd September 2017

You must login into Voobly to view image

Both Scheduled At 15 GMT in
VCOM Tournament Lounge !!!
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 SoBritish


Editado 19 de agosto de 2017 - 17:18 por SoBritish
ban the nasty ones, keep the creative ones :D
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 __KINGO__


Escrito 19 de agosto de 2017 - 23:09
lol .. there is king of players .. only play with good civs . and when they get civ they dont know how to play with .. they close Voobly .. after that they say it's crush :@ :@
smurf smurf smurf smurf
i hate them
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 Buzz_Glokki


Escrito 20 de agosto de 2017 - 01:06
If you only play people who have played 15~ games last week and about 40-60% win percentage you will be playing the people you searching for. People smurf cus of reasons you might not understand, but banning them doesnt solve your problem.
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 __KINGO__


Escrito 20 de agosto de 2017 - 14:48
sometime u find 19xx play like noob
there is something for playing like that
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 eL_Apoca_


Editado 21 de agosto de 2017 - 00:29 por eL_Apoca_
Smurfing is part of the evolution of the game, most of the top players have several smurf accounts, for higher levels is a must to have atleast 2 or 3 smurf nicks to catch few games, to warm up, to play with less skilled friends, to test new strategies even to chill out.

The guy who created the topic clearly has no intention to get better because when you are climbing the ladder facing smurfs is the only way to push ur limits.

Newbie players have NPL in order to prevent noob bashing, if you are grown enough to be playing in medieval siege you can only choose who you play with, buy a premium or simply improve ur skills, there are many options for you to prevent to get rektd by smurfs, asking for banning them is too selfish and biased to even consider it.
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 SuperEspert


Escrito 21 de agosto de 2017 - 02:39
eL_Apoca_ wrote:
Smurfing is part of the evolution of the game, most of the top players have several smurf accounts, for higher levels is a must to have atleast 2 or 3 smurf nicks to catch few games, to warm up, to play with less skilled friends, to test new strategies even to chill out.

The guy who created the topic clearly has no intention to get better because when you are climbing the ladder facing smurfs is the only way to push ur limits.

Newbie players have NPL in order to prevent noob bashing, if you are grown enough to be playing in medieval siege you can only choose who you play with, buy a premium or simply improve ur skills, there are many options for you to prevent to get rektd by smurfs, asking for banning them is too selfish and biased to even consider it.
well said.
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 Winged_Hussar


Editado 21 de agosto de 2017 - 14:07 por Winged_Hussar
eL_Apoca_ wrote:
Smurfing is part of the evolution of the game, most of the top players have several smurf accounts, for higher levels is a must to have atleast 2 or 3 smurf nicks to catch few games, to warm up, to play with less skilled friends, to test new strategies even to chill out.

The guy who created the topic clearly has no intention to get better because when you are climbing the ladder facing smurfs is the only way to push ur limits.

Why just don't play unrated games instead of using smurf account?
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 [RoMs]SmartigZ


Escrito 21 de agosto de 2017 - 14:29
Not i think that not banned but i guess will be a good idea do more difficulty can create new accounts so anyways smurf always will exist
Enlace | Responder | Citar
 [LyF]rabid_wolf


Escrito 21 de agosto de 2017 - 14:59
Simple solution is display AKA rate, but need to pay to get that in MS! :(


Enlace | Responder | Citar
12[3]4
Mostrando 31 - 45 de 60 mensajes
Saltar a Foro:
2 Usuario(s) están leyendo este tema (en los últimos 30 minutos)
0 miembros, 2 invitados